Guide · Practitioner
Rewriting an Existing Page for GEO: Worked Example
Rewriting a page for AI search mostly means making it clearer for people: a direct answer first, question-led sections, real evidence, scannable tables and honest dates. Google says you don't need to rewrite content specifically for AI, as its systems understand synonyms, and that unique, helpful content matters most (Google). This worked example shows one illustrative page before and after, with the reasoning for each change.
The company, page and figures below are illustrative. Facts about Google's guidance are from Google Search Central, accessed 30 Oct 2026. Recommendations marked "our view" are interpretation.
On this page
- What's the page we're rewriting?
- Step 1: How do you audit the page?
- Step 2: How do you rewrite the opening?
- Step 3: How do you restructure headings?
- Step 4: How do you add evidence?
- Step 5: How do you use tables and lists?
- Step 6: How much product mention is right?
- Step 7: What shouldn't you change?
- What did the final page look like?
- How do you check whether it worked?
- Which rewriting pitfalls should you watch for?
- Exercise
- Checklist
- From MentionX data: why rewrites focus on the page types engines cite
- Worked example: Ledgerline rewrites its approval workflows page
- How do you choose which page to rewrite first?
- How do you gather the questions a page should answer?
- How do you keep the brand voice during a rewrite?
- How do you handle SEO during a rewrite?
- Who should review the rewrite?
- How do you document what changed?
- How do you scale rewrites across many pages?
- Common questions
- Related
- Sources
Checked on 31 October 2026. "Our view" marks MentionX opinion. Ledgerline is a fictional company used for illustration.
What's the page we're rewriting?
Fictional example: "Acme Payroll", a fictional payroll software company, has a 900-word blog post titled "Everything You Need to Know About Payroll for Part-Time Staff". It opens with three paragraphs about how the world of work is changing, mentions the product in every section, has no dates, cites no sources and uses headings like "The Basics" and "Final Thoughts". Prompt tests show engines answering questions on the topic without citing it.
Step 1: How do you audit the page?
Our view: list the questions the page should answer, then check whether it answers them clearly.
| Question readers ask | Answered? | Where |
|---|---|---|
| How is part-time pay calculated? | Partly | Paragraph 5 |
| How is holiday pay worked out? | No | — |
| What records must employers keep? | Vaguely | Paragraph 7 |
| How does Acme handle it? | Yes, repeatedly | Throughout |
The audit shows the page talks about the product more than it answers the reader's questions.
Step 2: How do you rewrite the opening?
Before: "In today's fast-changing world of work, more businesses than ever rely on part-time staff. But payroll can be complex. In this post, we'll explore everything you need to know…"
After: "Part-time staff are paid for the hours they work at an agreed rate, and in many countries are entitled to holiday pay and other rights in proportion to their hours. Employers must record hours accurately and check local rules on minimum wage, holiday and tax. This guide explains each step, with official sources for [country]."
Our view: the new opening answers the main question, says what's covered and promises sources. It can be quoted on its own. Country-specific rules must link to the official government source; don't state legal facts from memory.
Step 3: How do you restructure headings?
| Before | After |
|---|---|
| The Basics | How is part-time pay calculated? |
| Holidays | How is holiday pay worked out for part-time staff? |
| Staying Compliant | What records must employers keep? |
| How Acme Helps | How do payroll tools handle part-time pay? |
| Final Thoughts | Checklist |
Question headings match how people ask and help readers scan. W3C recommends headings that describe the section and follow a logical structure (W3C).
Step 4: How do you add evidence?
- Link each legal or tax rule to the official government page, dated.
- Add a worked calculation, labelled fictional, showing hours × rate and holiday accrual.
- Add a short quote from Acme's in-house payroll specialist with their name and role.
- Add "Reviewed by [name], [role], [date]".
Google's helpful content guidance asks whether content provides original information and clear sourcing, and whether it's clear who created it (Google).
Step 5: How do you use tables and lists?
Our view: the calculation becomes a table (hours, rate, gross pay, holiday accrued), and the compliance section becomes a checklist. Tables use real HTML so they're accessible (W3C).
Step 6: How much product mention is right?
Our view: reduce product mentions to one section near the end and a short note in the checklist. The page earns trust by answering the reader's question first. A page that reads as an advert is less likely to be cited as a neutral explanation.
Step 7: What shouldn't you change?
- The URL: keep it so existing links and indexing are preserved
- Accurate content that's working: improve around it
- The core topic: don't stretch the page to cover unrelated queries
Google warns against creating many pages for every query variation, which can be scaled content abuse (Google).
What did the final page look like?
| Element | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Opening | Throat-clearing | 50-word direct answer |
| Headings | Vague | Questions |
| Sources | None | Official links, dated |
| Author | None | Named reviewer |
| Example | None | Labelled calculation table |
| Product mentions | Every section | One section |
| Date | None | Published and updated |
How do you check whether it worked?
Our view: compare before and after over at least a few weeks, as engines take time to recrawl. Track:
- Search Console clicks and impressions for the page (Google)
- Prompt tests for the audited questions, logged with date and engine
- Whether answers cite the page or quote its opening
Results vary, and changes in engines can confound comparisons, so record dates.
Which rewriting pitfalls should you watch for?
- Rewriting tone without improving substance
- Adding FAQ blocks that repeat the body
- Inflating word count; Google says it doesn't prefer particular word counts (Google)
- Changing URLs without redirects
- Removing dates to look "evergreen"
Exercise
Pick one page. List five questions readers ask, mark whether each is answered, rewrite the opening as a 40–60 word answer, and convert vague headings to questions.
Checklist
- Questions audited
- Answer-first opening
- Question headings
- Sources, author, dates
- Tables and labelled examples
- URL unchanged
From MentionX data: why rewrites focus on the page types engines cite
Method. Read-only aggregate queries over MentionX scans from 22 August to 29 October 2026 (UTC): 2,217 engine runs (2,154 completed) across 18 anonymised projects and six engines.
Across the MentionX sample, articles and homepages are the URL types cited most often. Pricing pages, docs and review pages are cited far less often:
| Cited URL type | Share of 9,750 citations |
|---|---|
| Blog or article | 19.6% |
| Homepage | 10.0% |
| Review page | 2.7% |
| Docs | 2.6% |
| Pricing | 1.9% |
| Wikipedia | 1.6% |
How often a brand is mentioned depends strongly on the type of prompt:
| Intent | Brand mentioned | Share of voice |
|---|---|---|
| Brand-specific | 100% | 64.3 |
| Comparison | 91.9% | 44.6 |
| Recommendation | 29.2% | 26.8 |
| Best-of | 26.6% | 22.7 |
| Problem | 5.7% | 7.7 |
Our view: the pages most worth rewriting are articles and key commercial pages that target best-of, recommendation and problem prompts, where brands are mentioned least and there is the most room to improve.
Limits. A convenience sample of mostly B2B software projects, run through engine APIs, which can behave differently from the consumer apps. Perplexity, Copilot and DeepSeek figures come from a single day (26 October 2026), so treat them as a snapshot, not a trend.
Worked example: Ledgerline rewrites its approval workflows page
Ledgerline is a fictional accounts-payable tool. Figures are illustrative.
Ledgerline's page on approval workflows opens with three paragraphs about "the future of finance" before saying what the feature does. Headings are vague, such as "Built for you", and claims like "faster approvals" have no source.
The content lead lists the five questions buyers ask most about approvals, using sales calls and support tickets. She rewrites the opening as a two-sentence answer: what approval workflows in Ledgerline do and who they suit. Each heading becomes a question, and each section starts with a direct answer. A table compares single-step and multi-step approvals. Claims about speed are replaced with a description of how the feature works, because the team has no sourced data. The URL, the screenshots and the customer quote stay the same.
After two months, the team reruns its prompts. The page is cited for some workflow questions where it wasn't before, though not for every engine.
How do you choose which page to rewrite first?
Start with pages that already get traffic or links but are rarely cited in AI answers for the prompts they target. These pages have authority but don't present their content in a way engines can use. Next, look at pages that target high-intent prompts, such as comparisons and best-of lists in your category. Leave pages that already perform well in both search and AI answers until last. A simple scoring sheet with traffic, links, target prompts and current citations is enough to rank them.
How do you gather the questions a page should answer?
Use several sources: sales call notes, support tickets, on-site search, People also ask boxes and your prompt set. Group similar questions together and write each group as one clear question. Aim for a handful of core questions per page rather than dozens. If the list grows too long, the page may need splitting into two.
How do you keep the brand voice during a rewrite?
Direct answers don't have to be dull. Keep your usual tone in examples, transitions and explanations, and make only the opening sentence of each section plain and factual. Read the rewrite aloud. If it sounds like a different company, adjust the wording but keep the structure.
How do you handle SEO during a rewrite?
Keep the URL unless there is a strong reason to change it. If you must, redirect the old URL permanently. Keep the title close to the original if it ranks well, and update the meta description to match the new opening. Check that internal links still point to the page and that anchor text still makes sense. Avoid removing sections that bring in search traffic without checking first.
Who should review the rewrite?
Ask a subject expert to check facts, a product marketer to check positioning and an editor to check clarity. If the page includes legal or pricing claims, involve the relevant owner. Keep the review short by sending a list of what changed and why, rather than the whole page without context.
How do you document what changed?
Keep a change log with the date, the sections changed and the reason. Save a copy of the old version. If results move, you can link them to specific changes. If results drop, you can roll back parts of the rewrite rather than starting over.
How do you scale rewrites across many pages?
Turn the steps into a short template: audit questions, opening, headings, evidence, tables and what not to change. Train writers on one finished example. Review the first few rewrites closely, then spot-check. Our view: rewriting ten important pages well does more than lightly editing a hundred.
Share the finished example with the wider team so writers can see the before and after side by side, with notes on why each change was made.
Common questions
Should I rewrite or start a new page? Rewrite when the page already has links or traffic; start fresh only when the topic or intent has changed.
How long does a rewrite take? It depends on the page, but most take a few days including review.
Will a rewrite hurt rankings? It can if you remove useful content or change the URL; keep both where possible.
Related
Sources
- Google, AI optimization guide; Creating helpful content; Performance report
- W3C WAI, Headings; Tables
All accessed 30 Oct 2026.
Questions
What's the first thing to change when rewriting for AI search?
Usually the opening. Put a direct, self-contained answer to the page's main question in the first 40–60 words, then support it.
Do I need to rewrite content specifically for AI?
Google says you don't need to rewrite content into a special format for AI, because its systems understand synonyms and meaning. Rewrite to make the page clearer and more useful for people.
Should I change the URL?
Usually not. Keep the URL so existing links and indexing are preserved. If you must change it, redirect the old URL.